The history of Indian democracy is a chronicle of promises that change their complexion somewhere between the campaign trail and the ballot box. When the Nari Shakti Vandan Adhiniyam was passed in the new Parliament building in September 2023, a large section of the country erupted in celebration. The ruling dispensation called it historic. The opposition claimed it as their old dream finally fulfilled. The media packaged it as a grand victory for Indian women. But when the fine print of the law began to surface — particularly its mandatory conditionality of delimitation — it became unmistakably clear that what had been enacted was a political manifesto, not a revolutionary transformation.
This essay investigates a question that the corridors of power deliberately leave unanswered: will reserving seats in Parliament and state assemblies change the lives of millions of women who stand outside police stations only to find their FIRs refused? Will one-third of Lok Sabha seats being ring-fenced for women help the girl in a village who was pulled out of school after Class Eight because her family decided she was now 'marriageable'? Will more women's faces in the gallery of Parliament reduce the number of mothers dying in childbirth in government hospitals?
The answer is uncomfortable, but it is unambiguous. There is a vast and deliberately obscured chasm between the politics of reservation and the reality of empowerment. This essay is an attempt to map that chasm honestly.
Background: Seven Decades of a Deferred Demand
The demand for women's parliamentary representation is not new. It was first taken seriously in the 1974 report 'Towards Equality' — the landmark document on the status of women in India. In 1996, the H.D. Deve Gowda government introduced the first Women's Reservation Bill in the Lok Sabha. From that moment until 2023, the Bill became a recurring casualty of political manoeuvring. The Lalu-Mulayam combine ensured it never saw the light of day. The reason was transparent: entrenched male political fiefdoms had no interest in disruption.
The 2023 legislation is technically significant: one-third of seats in the Lok Sabha, state legislative assemblies, and the Delhi assembly will be reserved for women. Within the seats already reserved for Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes, one-third will go to women from those communities. The reservation is set to expire after fifteen years, though Parliament retains the power to extend it.
But the law's most consequential feature is buried in its conditionality: it will come into force only after the next census is conducted and the subsequent delimitation exercise is completed. The census that was due in 2021 was postponed indefinitely due to COVID-19 and remained uncertain through 2024-25. Delimitation itself is a process that unfolds over years. The arithmetic of this is stark — the law has virtually no chance of being in effect before the 2029 general elections. Several constitutional scholars believe 2034 is a more realistic estimate, if at all.
The question that demands an honest answer is therefore this: was this law crafted to genuinely bring women into positions of power, or was it a carefully constructed electoral instrument designed to harvest votes in the next election without incurring any of the actual political cost of implementation? To find the answer, we must understand the political economy of delimitation.
The Delimitation Trap: Democracy's Premeditated Restructuring
Delimitation is a constitutional process by which parliamentary and assembly constituency boundaries are redrawn on the basis of census data. In theory, it is an instrument of democratic equity — the practical expression of the principle of 'one person, one vote, one value.' In the Indian context, however, delimitation has become an extraordinarily contentious and politically explosive exercise.
In 1976, Indira Gandhi's government, through the 42nd Constitutional Amendment, froze the number of Lok Sabha and assembly seats until 2001 — a deadline subsequently extended to 2026. The political calculus behind this decision was straightforward: southern states had implemented family planning programmes with far greater success than their northern counterparts, resulting in lower population growth rates. A fresh delimitation would have rewarded states like Uttar Pradesh, Bihar, and Madhya Pradesh — which had the highest populations — with more seats, while proportionately diminishing the parliamentary weight of Tamil Nadu, Kerala, Andhra Pradesh, Karnataka, and Telangana.
Now, the 2023 Nari Shakti Vandan Adhiniyam has once again made delimitation an indispensable precondition for a major constitutional change — this time, women's reservation. The consequences of the post-census delimitation are predictable: Lok Sabha seats could expand from 543 to somewhere between 750 and 800. Of these, one-third would be reserved for women. But the largest gains in seat count would flow to the high-population states of the Hindi heartland.
The southern states — those that chose responsible demographic behaviour, invested in education, and contributed disproportionately to national GDP — will see their relative parliamentary clout diminish. This is a structural injustice embedded in the Constitution's arithmetic: responsible behaviour is penalised. The people of Tamil Nadu and Kerala are asking a legitimate question: we kept our families small, educated our children, paid our taxes, and drove economic growth — and now our voice in Parliament will be weakened?
In this context, women's reservation ceases to be the primary purpose of the legislation and becomes, instead, a Trojan horse — a politically unassailable cover under which a far-reaching and deeply contentious north-India-centric restructuring of parliamentary representation can be set in motion. Women's empowerment here is not the destination. It is the vehicle. And that is perhaps the most cynical feature of this entire enterprise.
The Dynastic Dividend: Who Will Actually Benefit?
Indian politics has a structural pathology that no one in power has any incentive to cure: it operates, in large measure, as a network of family enterprises. The Samajwadi Party has its Mulayam-Akhilesh-Dimple lineage. The Rashtriya Janata Dal has Lalu-Rabri-Misa-Tejashwi. The National Conference has the Abdullahs. The DMK has the Karunanidhi-Stalin dynasty. The Telugu Desam Party, Shiv Sena, and the Nationalist Congress Party all have their founding family dominance. And above all of them, the Congress party's Nehru-Indira-Rajiv-Sonia-Rahul-Priyanka inheritance remains the most vivid illustration of how thoroughly Indian democracy has been colonised by political inheritance.
Now ask a simple question in the context of women's reservation: when a constituency is designated as a women's reserved seat, whom will the political parties nominate? Will they turn to a capable, independent woman party worker who has spent years building a grassroots presence? Or will they find it far more convenient — and electorally safer — to field the wife, daughter, daughter-in-law, or sister of the male politician who previously held that seat?
The answer requires no speculation. We have thirty years of evidence from the 73rd and 74th Constitutional Amendments, which mandated women's reservation in panchayati raj institutions and urban local bodies. Research has consistently documented the phenomenon of the 'Pradhan Pati' or 'Sarpanch Pati' — the husband or male family member who exercises actual decision-making authority while the elected woman holds the designation in name alone. At the parliamentary level, this phenomenon will not diminish. It will be institutionalised at a far grander scale.
Consider the arithmetic: a dynastic party controls ten seats. Four are now designated as women's reserved constituencies. The party patriarch does not panic. He simply fields his wife in one, his daughter in another, his niece in a third, and a loyalist's wife in the fourth. The seats remain within the family orbit. On paper, four women have been elected to Parliament. In practice, four men continue to hold power through proxies. The reservation has not disrupted dynastic politics — it has given it a new constitutional wardrobe.
The more damaging consequence falls on the woman who genuinely wishes to enter politics on her own terms — who has no political family, no inheritance, no patriarch to ride on, and who has built her credentials through her own labour. When parties hand tickets to family nominees, this independent woman's path becomes even more constricted. Previously she faced a male competitor. Now she faces a 'leader's daughter' who has received what amounts to a hereditary entitlement dressed up as social justice. Women's reservation, in this configuration, does not dismantle the old boys' network. It simply updates its membership roster.
Seats Are Not Empowerment: Dismantling a False Equation
Our policymakers have constructed a seductively simple equation: more seats equals more empowerment. It is as misleading as saying that more doctors equals better healthcare, regardless of whether the hospitals have medicines or electricity. Empowerment is a multi-dimensional process, and parliamentary representation is a narrow slice of it — relevant and meaningful only when it is genuine, independent, and structurally supported.
Empowerment rests on three foundational pillars: agency — the capacity to make autonomous decisions about one's own life; resources — access to education, health, and economic independence; and structure — institutions and laws that guarantee security and deliver justice. Parliamentary seats belong to the third pillar, and only partially. They matter when occupied by women who possess genuine agency and act independently of patriarchal structures. They are essentially decorative when occupied by proxies.
Rwanda is frequently cited as the global benchmark: its Parliament has over sixty percent women — the highest proportion anywhere in the world. But does the average Rwandan woman enjoy the freedoms and opportunities of a woman in a mature democracy? Does the correlation between parliamentary representation and lived reality hold up in Rwanda's case? The data is far more ambiguous than the headline figure suggests. Bangladesh had a woman Prime Minister for over two decades. It has also had one of the highest rates of child marriage in the world for much of that period. The correlation between female political leadership and female social outcomes is not linear. It is mediated by institutions, culture, enforcement, and economic development.
Within India, the evidence is equally instructive. Uttar Pradesh — the state that has produced more MPs than any other and has had several powerful women political figures — remains near the bottom of national rankings on female literacy, maternal mortality, sex ratio, and women's safety. Kerala and Himachal Pradesh, where women's political representation has historically been modest, consistently rank at the top on social indicators for women. The lesson is not that political representation is irrelevant. The lesson is that it is neither sufficient nor the most important variable. Ground-level institutional delivery matters far more.
The Police Station Door: Where Empowerment Goes to Die
The most unsparing test of women's empowerment in India is not conducted in Parliament. It is conducted at the entrance of a police station, where a woman arrives to report a crime — domestic violence, sexual assault, workplace harassment — and discovers that the law she was told protects her does not, in practice, extend to her.
Summoning the courage to enter a police station is itself an act of extraordinary bravery in Indian society, where reporting an assault is still routinely constructed as a matter of 'family honour' and 'social shame.' But what happens inside? Despite repeated Supreme Court directions, National Commission for Women guidelines, and the unambiguous mandate of the Criminal Procedure Code, the refusal to register FIRs remains commonplace. Women are advised to 'settle the matter at home.' They are told that 'family disputes should not enter the public domain.' Women's police stations were established across the country — but the institutional mindset that makes them necessary has not changed within them.
The question that demands a direct answer is this: will the presence of 181 women MPs in the Lok Sabha cause a Sub-Inspector in a district town to register an FIR that he is currently refusing to record? Will women's reservation alter the instincts of a police officer whose first impulse, when a woman walks in, is to send her away? Will a woman MP — who is, in all probability, a politician's wife or daughter — intervene in the life of a domestic violence survivor in a remote village of her constituency?
India's statute books are not empty. The Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005; the Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Act, 2013; the Dowry Prohibition Act; Sections 354, 375, and 498A of the Indian Penal Code — the legal architecture for women's protection is extensive. The problem is not the absence of law. The problem is the near-total collapse of compliance. And compliance requires a sensitised police force, an independent and expeditious judiciary, an accountable civil administration, and a transformed cultural consciousness.
None of these will emerge from women's reservation. They require police reform — including the implementation of the Supreme Court's landmark Prakash Singh judgment of 2006, which has been systematically ignored for two decades. They require transparency in judicial appointments and a sustained assault on case backlogs. They require gender sensitivity to be embedded in IAS, IPS, and IFS training at foundational stages. And most fundamentally, they require a cultural revolution — one that teaches a Station House Officer that his purpose is to serve citizens, not to protect the powerful and send the vulnerable away.
The judicial dimension of this failure is equally grim. When a woman musters the resolve to file a case, the trial may last years. Bail is obtained easily. Witnesses are intimidated into retracting statements. Police investigations are conducted with deliberate sloppiness. And at the end of this exhausting ordeal, the accused is frequently acquitted or receives a sentence that mocks the gravity of the crime. The woman, meanwhile, has been ground down by a system that punished her for seeking justice. This is a systemic failure of governance — and it is entirely immune to correction by parliamentary arithmetic.
The Entitlement Trap: An Unnecessary Burden on the Taxpayer
Every time a policy extends special rights or reservations to a defined group, it risks giving birth to a culture of entitlement — the belief that one is owed a position, a benefit, or a privilege by virtue of identity alone, irrespective of competence or contribution. Entitlement corrodes the incentive to pursue excellence and creates an environment where the politics of identity overrides the culture of merit. In the context of women's reservation, this risk is particularly acute.
If a woman enters politics with the foundational understanding that 'I have this seat because I am a woman' — she is deprived of the competitive crucible that forges a genuinely effective legislator. She does not need to build a constituency. She does not need to prove her competence against the full field. The seat is hers by category. This is not empowerment. This is a gilded cage — comfortable, perhaps, but ultimately diminishing.
The more concrete burden of entitlement falls on the taxpayer who finances the entire apparatus. Women's reservation, at every level from panchayats to Parliament, carries associated costs: administrative restructuring, special training programmes, awareness campaigns, monitoring mechanisms, and the bureaucratic overhead of managing the rotation of reserved seats across constituencies. None of this is inherently problematic if it delivers genuine change. But when the entire mechanism functions primarily as a vehicle for proxy representation — where a husband governs in the name of his wife — it constitutes a significant misallocation of public resources.
There is a deeper structural problem that reservation politics generates: it initiates an unending competitive cycle of demands. The moment women's reservation was enacted, the demand for an OBC sub-quota within it arose immediately. Tomorrow, other communities will assert similar claims. The following day, yet another group. This cascading competition for reservation within reservation, identity layered upon identity, ultimately ensures that the state is perpetually occupied with managing claims rather than delivering the foundational public goods — education, healthcare, security, justice — that would make any reservation unnecessary in the first place. The taxpayer finances this competition. The intended beneficiaries — ordinary women across the country — are served last, if at all.
What Actually Works: The Case for Grassroots Empowerment
If parliamentary reservation is not the answer, what is? The response is not complicated — but it demands political will of a kind that does not translate easily into electoral slogans. Genuine empowerment rests on four foundational interventions: education, healthcare, workplace dignity, and access to justice. Each of these is within the state's reach. Each of them has been chronically underfunded and underdelivered. And each of them would do more for the actual lives of Indian women than any number of reserved seats in any legislature.
Education: The Battle for the Classroom
Girl child education in India has improved over the past two decades — this is true and it is worth acknowledging. But improvement is not the same as adequacy. The National Family Health Survey (NFHS-5, 2019-21) reveals a persistent and damaging dropout crisis for girls between Classes Eight and Ten — precisely the age at which families in large parts of the country decide that a girl is 'marriageable' and withdraw her from school. This decision is not irrational from within the logic of a society that still treats a daughter's education as an expenditure rather than an investment, given that she will 'go to another family's home.'
The causes of this dropout crisis are layered: absence of functional girls' toilets in schools, distance and absence of safe transportation, prevalence of child marriage, the weight of domestic responsibilities placed on adolescent girls, and an entrenched cultural framework that systematically undervalues female education. Every one of these causes has a known solution. Functional, clean, segregated toilets in every school. Free bicycles or bus passes for girls in rural areas. Aggressive legal enforcement of the Prohibition of Child Marriage Act. Midday meal programmes that ensure nutritional adequacy. Scholarships and stipends that make it financially irrational for families to pull their daughters out of school.
At the higher education level, women's hostels, merit scholarships, and vocational training centres for first-generation learners are not charity — they are investments with measurable returns. An educated woman transforms her household's health outcomes, her children's educational trajectories, and her community's economic capacity. The ripple effects of female education are wider and more durable than any legislative reservation. They do not require a constitutional amendment. They require governance.
Healthcare: A Matter of Life and Death
India's maternal mortality rate has fallen — from approximately 130 per lakh live births in 2014-16 to 97 in 2018-20. This is progress. It is also an indictment. Ninety-seven mothers per lakh live births is an unconscionable figure for an economy of India's size and ambition. In states like Rajasthan, Uttar Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh, and Assam, the rate is far higher than the national average. These are preventable deaths — preventable with functional primary health centres, trained birth attendants, accessible obstetric care, and reliable supply chains for essential medicines.
Anaemia is the silent epidemic that stalks Indian women. NFHS-5 reports that 57 percent of women between the ages of 15 and 49 are anaemic. This is not a medical footnote. It is a crisis that diminishes productivity, endangers maternal and infant survival, and locks women into cycles of poor health that compromise every other dimension of their lives. Its roots lie in chronic under-nutrition, the cultural norm that women eat last and least within households, and the absence of menstrual health education and infrastructure.
Rural primary health centres are, in too many cases, monuments to the gap between policy and implementation: doctors absent, medicines unavailable, ASHA workers overloaded with responsibilities but under-resourced. For a woman in rural India, safe childbirth remains an aspiration that depends heavily on luck, geography, and economic status — none of which should determine whether a mother survives the birth of her child. Addressing this requires trained women health workers in every village, women doctors in district hospitals, menstrual health destigmatisation campaigns, and — urgently — the inclusion of women's mental health in the national health architecture, a domain that Indian health policy has treated as essentially non-existent.
Workplace Dignity: The Invisible Struggle
India presents a deeply contradictory picture on women's workforce participation. In sectors like information technology, banking, financial services, and media, women hold significant positions at senior levels. But India's female Labour Force Participation Rate (LFPR) hovers between 20 and 25 percent — among the lowest in the world, and far below the global average of approximately 47 percent. This is not a reflection of women's inability or unwillingness to work. It is a reflection of the structural and cultural barriers that confront them.
Safety concerns prevent women from taking up employment in sectors or locations that require commuting after dark. Family permission remains a prerequisite for many women, particularly in north and central India, effectively making a woman's economic agency contingent on male approval. The absence of affordable, reliable childcare near workplaces forces working mothers to make impossible choices. And the fear of harassment at the workplace — documented, systematic, and largely unpunished — deters entry into the formal workforce.
The Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace Act of 2013 was a significant legislative step. Its implementation has been a consistent disappointment. Internal Complaints Committees, which the Act mandates for every workplace with ten or more employees, are absent in a large proportion of small and medium enterprises. Where they exist, the social cost of filing a complaint — the near-certain labelling as a 'troublemaker,' the informal marginalisation, the whisper networks that follow — remains prohibitive for most women.
Workplace dignity is, at its core, a cultural problem. Not laughing at a female colleague's expense. Taking a woman's professional judgment seriously. Ensuring that maternity leave does not become a career sentence. These are not outcomes that any parliamentary reservation delivers. They require leadership commitment at the organisational level, peer accountability, and a social environment in which the working woman is respected, not merely tolerated. The policy levers — mandatory crèche facilities for employers above a threshold, equal pay audit mechanisms, flexible work schedules — exist and are within reach. The question is whether there is any political will to enforce them.
Access to Justice: The Right That Cannot Be Reserved
Access to justice is not merely a legal concept — it is the foundational infrastructure of empowerment. If a woman does not believe that she can walk into a police station, file a complaint, and have it acted upon, she will not seek justice. And if she does not seek justice, the perpetrator is protected, and the cycle of impunity continues.
India's police infrastructure suffers from chronic deficiencies that no women's reservation legislation addresses: a police-to-population ratio of approximately 155 officers per lakh citizens against the United Nations recommended standard of 222; a national average of just over 11 percent women in the police force; deep-seated caste and gender biases in the institutional culture; and the pervasive reality of political pressure shaping investigative and prosecutorial decisions.
The Supreme Court's 2013 judgment in Lalita Kumari vs. Government of Uttar Pradesh was unambiguous: registration of an FIR upon receipt of information about a cognisable offence is a mandatory legal obligation, not a matter of police discretion. How many women in India know this? How many have the education, the confidence, and the social standing to cite a Supreme Court judgment to a hostile Sub-Inspector? Empowerment means ensuring that every woman — not just the educated and the connected — can access this right. That requires legal aid clinics in every block, mobile complaint portals with mandatory response timelines, more women police officers, and the systematic accountability of officers who refuse to register valid complaints.
The judiciary must be part of this reckoning. Fast-track courts for cases involving crimes against women have been established — but they are burdened with case backlogs and staffed inadequately. The average time from FIR to judgment in sexual assault cases remains far too long, during which witnesses are pressured, evidence degrades, and survivors are re-traumatised by repeated court appearances. Video-conferencing for recording a survivor's testimony, in-camera proceedings, time-bound trial schedules — these are manageable reforms that would deliver more real justice than any constitutional amendment on seat reservation.
An Alternative Framework: Competence Over Entitlement
Does any of the above argument imply that women's political representation is irrelevant or undesirable? It does not — and it must not be read that way. Women's presence in legislative bodies matters. It shapes the policy agenda, normalises female leadership, and brings lived experiences of half the population into the deliberative process. The question is not whether women should be in Parliament. The question is how they get there, and whether their presence reflects genuine political agency or sophisticated proxy governance.
An alternative framework deserves serious consideration. Rather than reserving seats — which creates a structurally artificial outcome and is prone to dynastic capture — political parties could be legally mandated to field women candidates for at least one-third of all constituencies they contest. This ensures gender representation in the candidate pool while preserving the competitive integrity of the electoral process. A woman who wins a general seat against a full field of candidates carries an electoral mandate and a political authority that no reservation can confer. She has proven herself. She does not carry the stigma — however unfair that stigma may be — of 'she's there because of her gender.'
Simultaneously, the critical intervention must be at the panchayat and local body level, where reservation has existed for three decades. The difference between what exists and what is needed is not more reservation — it is genuine capacity building. Elected women at the panchayat level must be trained to actually govern: to read and approve budgets, to evaluate contractor performance, to conduct grievance hearings, to understand their legal powers. If women at the grassroots are equipped to govern effectively — and protected from the 'Pradhan Pati' phenomenon by genuine accountability mechanisms — a generation of trained, experienced women leaders will emerge organically. They will move from gram sabhas to block committees, from district councils to state assemblies, from state assemblies to Parliament. Not because they were handed a reserved seat. Because they earned one.
The curriculum in schools must also do its work. Children who grow up reading about Rani Lakshmibai, Sarojini Naidu, Kalpana Chawla, Indira Gandhi, Sudha Murthy, and the many extraordinary women scientists, jurists, and entrepreneurs who have shaped modern India carry within them a cultural shift that no legislation can replicate. Empowerment that is internalised by society is orders of magnitude more durable than empowerment that is imposed from above.
The Role of Media: Mirror or Distortion?
Indian media's role in women's empowerment is one of the more instructive contradictions of our public life. On one hand, investigative journalism has exposed crimes against women, brought survivors' testimonies to national attention, and held institutions accountable in ways that have occasionally moved the needle of public discourse. On the other hand, mainstream entertainment media continues to present women primarily as objects of spectacle — in film, in television serials, and in advertising — in ways that normalise a fundamental inequality of gaze.
In the coverage of the Nari Shakti Vandan Adhiniyam, the media largely did what it routinely does: polished the surface and avoided the depth. Cameras lingered on the historic scenes of the bill being passed. Almost no outlet asked the obvious question: since implementation requires delimitation, and delimitation requires a census that has not been conducted, what is the actual timeline for this law to take effect? Almost no analysis examined the three-decade track record of women's reservation in panchayati raj — and what that record tells us about the 'Pradhan Pati' phenomenon at the parliamentary level.
Responsible journalism on women's empowerment means covering both the triumphs and the structural failures — the woman who won the landmark case and the woman who could not get an FIR registered. It means covering both the CEO who built a billion-dollar company and the girl who left school at fourteen because her family could not see the point of educating her. It means refusing to treat parliamentary optics as a substitute for institutional reform. The media has the reach to shape public understanding of what empowerment actually requires. That it has largely chosen to celebrate symbols rather than interrogate substance is one of the more costly failures of this particular public conversation.
Conclusion: Genuine Empowerment Demands Genuine Politics
The purpose of this analysis is not to oppose women's empowerment. Every argument made in these pages is animated by a commitment to that goal. The purpose is to insist on the distinction between empowerment and political performance — between the difficult, unglamorous, ground-level work of building systems that serve women, and the far more photogenic act of passing a law that will not come into force for a decade and will, when it does, primarily advantage dynastic political families.
When a government enacts legislation whose implementation conditions ensure it will not take effect before the next general election, whose structural design makes it vulnerable to proxy capture by exactly the political families it should challenge, and whose attached process of delimitation threatens to destabilise federal equity — to call such legislation 'historic' is to participate in a carefully managed deception.
The real struggle for women's empowerment is located in the primary school where an eight-year-old girl opens a textbook for the first time. It is in the district hospital where a pregnant woman receives timely and dignified care. It is in the police station where an officer not only registers an FIR but treats the complainant with the respect the law requires of him. It is in the office where a woman is taken seriously for her competence, not resented for her ambition or patronised for her gender.
The Constitution of India, in Articles 14, 15, and 16, guarantees equality to every citizen. That guarantee means the state is obligated to ensure that every woman — regardless of caste, religion, region, or class — has equal access to opportunity and security. This obligation is not fulfilled by reservation. It is fulfilled by governance: the patient, unspectacular, daily work of building schools that educate, hospitals that heal, police stations that protect, and courts that deliver justice.
The maturity of a democracy is not measured by how many women's faces appear in Parliament. It is measured by whether every woman — in every village, every slum, every district — can access justice and opportunity. Until that practical reality exists, the reserved seats in the glass halls of Parliament are little more than an elegant decoration.
Real empowerment does not come from entitlement. It comes from capability. And capability is built through education, healthcare, economic independence, and the rule of law. Without these four foundations, any reservation — however well-intentioned — is exactly what this essay calls it: a political misadventure. A spectacular expedition that looks impressive from the outside, but has no meaningful destination.
India's women deserve better. They have always deserved better. And they will continue to deserve better until the country's political class decides to govern rather than simply to perform.
No comments:
Post a Comment